<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Urology Product Guide &#187; Journal of Urology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.urologyproductguide.com/blog/tag/journal-of-urology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.urologyproductguide.com/blog</link>
	<description>A comprehensive guide to urology products for medical professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>AUA&#8217;s Controversial PSA Best Practice Statement Is Published</title>
		<link>http://www.urologyproductguide.com/blog/2009/12/24/auas-controversial-psa-best-practice-statement-is-published/</link>
		<comments>http://www.urologyproductguide.com/blog/2009/12/24/auas-controversial-psa-best-practice-statement-is-published/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 06:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Sullivan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Prostate Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Urological Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal of Urology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostate-specific antigen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.urologyproductguide.com/blog/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American Urological Association (AUA)&#8217;s updated Prostate-Specific Antigen Best Practice Statement, first presented at the annual meeting of the AUA in April, was published in the November issue of the Journal of Urology. The statement includes the controversial guidance that the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test should be offered to men starting at the age of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.urologyproductguide.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/American-Urological-Association.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-159" src="http://www.urologyproductguide.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/American-Urological-Association.png" border="0" alt="American Urological Association" width="200" height="100" /></a>The American Urological Association (AUA)&#8217;s updated Prostate-Specific Antigen Best Practice Statement, first presented at the annual meeting of the AUA in April, was published in the November issue of the Journal of Urology. The statement includes the controversial guidance that the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test should be offered to men starting at the age of 40 years, which one critic has said is not supported by any convincing evidence</p>
<p>For the full Story, <a href="http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/713192" target="_blank">Click Here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.urologyproductguide.com/blog/2009/12/24/auas-controversial-psa-best-practice-statement-is-published/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
